As I write this, Christopher Nolan's adaptation of The Odyssey is a $1.7 billion box office success.
Odysseus' epic journey from the Trojan War back to his wife in Ithaca certainly lends itself to the Nolan treatment. But step back a moment and consider the tale.
If you've got the time, dust off your college edition and give it a read. There are contemporary communication lessons here. As much as The Odyssey is an adventure story of gods, monsters, and heroes, it’s also an epic about the power of story to pursuade an audience.
It establishes storytelling as a fundamental act with life and death consequences. Odysseus uses narrative to establish identity, earn trust, create alliances, conceal vulnerability, and shape reputations.1
He doesn’t survive on physical strength, divine support, and martial skill alone. Instead, he navigates potential outcomes via story. His ability to select, withhold, invent, revise, and perform stories according to audience and circumstance provides openings for him survive, succeed, and move on.
"Of all men now alive you are the best in plots and storytelling," the goddess Athena tells him.
Along the way we witness audiences puncture meaning, test narratives, and create rival accounts throughout the epic. The narrative battle builds tension. Who’s truth will win?
Whether Homer tapped into something very modern with his take on storytelling, or story and its permutations haven't changed much since his time, I'm not quite sure. I do know, though, that storytelling from the days of old has its modern applications.
Finding Odysseus
Homeric heroes are static. They’re stubborn. The persona is captured in the Greek concept of biē : unyielding physical power, warrior pride, and an insistence on battering through obstacles until something breaks.
Most die unhappily: Ajax by suicide, Achilles by an arrow, and Agamemnon by murder.
Odysseus is “untypical”, in the words of the classicist WB Stanford. He's versatile, shifty, clever, and capable of assuming many guises or narrative roles. He has what the ancient Greeks called mētis. He has "cunning intelligence," "resourcefulness," "craft," or "guile."
Mētis lets Odysseus endure temporary powerlessness, wear disguises, and tolerate a gap between who he is and how he appears. A typical Greek hero shatters when his pride is tested. Odysseus adapts.
Odysseus isn't fighting when we first meet him. He’s weeping. He sits on the shore of an island where he’s been stranded for seven years. Fortunately, the nymph Calypso brings him good news. He’s free to leave. They build a raft together. He departs and is battered at sea.
Eighteen days later he washes ashore on the island of Scheria with nothing. He arrives naked and caked in brine. The Phaeacians who find him have no idea who he is and Odysseus keeps it that way. He uses discretion as strategy.
The Phaeacian king entertains his mysterious and, up to this point, anonymous, guest with athletic games. It is here that Odysseus spots an opening. He demonstrates a noble physicality that creates narrative opportunities to demonstrate who he is.
He grabs the largest discus available and throws it further than anyone has before. He boldly challenges anyone who will accept to boxing, wrestling, or archery. He is, in his way, revealing himself. The discus allows him to physically assert his noble, heroic stature before he asserts it verbally.2
Who are you?, the curious king finally demands.
"I am Laertes’ son, Odysseus,” he reveals. “Men hold me formidable for guile in peace and war: this fame has gone abroad to the sky’s rim."
What follows is one of the most consequential acts of storytelling in Western literature. Over four books in the epic, Odysseus narrates his wanderings: the Cyclops, the witch Circe, the descent to the dead, the Sirens, the monster Scylla, and the loss of every one of his companions. When he pauses, his listeners sit "spellbound down the shadowed halls."
When he finishes, they load him with gifts and sail him home to Ithaca.
Consider how this worked.
Odysseus didn’t announce himself upon his arrival. He held back. He proved himself through demonstrable action. He finally and only reveals himself when the curious king has reason to care. Odysseus had an objective: to secure transport home. He uses a mesmerizing, monster-filled account of his wanderings to win his audience’s awe, secure safe passage, and, bonus points, lavish gifts befitting a hero.3
The classicist John Peradotto argues that for Odysseus, name and narration are inseparable: he doesn't simply have an identity; he produces one in the telling.4
What does this have to do with anything?
All this is well and good, but what of it?
The Greek oral tradition illustrates that stories do more than entertain or inform. They perform social functions. They construct roles, obligations, and possibilities for action. Recognizing this helps communicators avoid reducing narrative to mere “content” and foregrounds the ethical and strategic stakes of controlling how events are told.
Odysseus doesn't survive because he's the strongest warrior or the most favored by the gods. He survives because he knows how to tell the right story to the right audience at the right time. He also knows that audiences will challenge him and knows how to react when they do.
Take Penelope, his wife.
When he finally returns to Ithaca, he disguises himself a beggar . He deliberately conceals who he is mindful that his fellow warrior Agamemnon returned home openly and was immediately murdered by his wife and her lover.
Odysseus uses narrative disguise to control the timing of his disclosures. He bides his time with story to ensure he can test loyalties and assess domestic threats. He constructs a story for his wife. He says he knows her husband and that he will soon return.
Penelope challenges him. She tests him. She asks for proof. She demands specific, verifiable details about what Odysseus looked like and what he wore.
Odysseus responds with precise descriptions: a heavy purple wool cloak, a golden brooch depicting a hound gripping a fawn, and the name of his herald. Only when he reveals these private details does Penelope begin to believe. She remains cautious, though, and devises one final test. She asks that their marriage bed be moved out of their chamber.
That is impossible, Odysseus says. He built the bed himself around a living olive tree. He carved one of the bedposts directly from the rooted tree trunk. The bed, he says, cannot be moved. It is this private knowledge, this receipt that Odysseus possesses, that finally gives Penelope the proof that Odysseus is who he says he is.
Odysseus can claim anything he wants. Penelope determines what’s real.
In modern media environments, audiences similarly interpret, critique, and question stories, whether through social media, reviews, or informal conversation.
Since narrative control is never absolute, meaning emerges through negotiation between speakers and listeners. Embracing this tension informs approaches to brand storytelling, political messaging, and public discourse. It encourages communicators to anticipate skepticism and to build narratives that invite dialogue rather than demand passive acceptance.
It invites us to craft narratives that are both compelling and accountable, grounded in evidence and open to dialogue, recognizing that the true power of communication lies not only in speaking but in being heard, tested, and ultimately trusted.
Odysseus doesn't always get it right.
The most striking example comes during his escape from the Cyclops Polyphemus. Trapped in the monster's cave, Odysseus uses a brilliant linguistic trick: when Polyphemus asks his name, Odysseus says he is "Nobody".5 After Odysseus blinds the giant with a heated stake, Polyphemus screams to his fellow Cyclopes that "Nobody is killing me!" They wander away, assuming nothing is wrong.
It's a perfect piece of narrative engineering. But Odysseus can't leave it alone. As his ship pulls away, he shouts his real name across the water: "I am Odysseus, sacker of cities!"
Polyphemus, now able to name his attacker, prays to his father, the god Poseidon. That prayer curses Odysseus to more suffering.
The episode captures another Greek characteristic passed down through the millennia: hubris. It shows how a desire for recognition can undermine the very success you've achieved. Odysseus had won. His disguise had worked. But he needed the Cyclops to know who had beaten him, and that need for credit brought disaster.
Modern analogues include brands or leaders whose pursuit of visibility or narrative dominance leads to overexposure or backlash. It’s the company that turns every cultural moment into self-congratulation, the founder whose personal mythology overwhelms the customer's practical reasons for buying, the "purpose" campaign that exposes an inconsistency in their activity.
The Cyclops problem is the problem of confusing attention with durable reputation.
Now What?
Communicators live in a loud age. Shysters and carnival barkers dominate many of our channels with their volume. Don’t be one of them.
The goal isn’t to just capture attention. Any loud noise can do that. It’s to create recognition and in that recognition, identification by your target audience with the thing that you do.
Don’t make empty claims. Yes, we’re told to fake it ’til we make it but hold your receipts. Someone will demand them someday.
Storytelling alone doesn't get Odysseus home. His stories work when he times them well, backs them with proof, and resists the urge to embellish. They fail when he forgets those things. Athena calls him the best storyteller alive, but characters like Penelope decide whether his stories are true.
Here are some lessons Odysseus teaches us.
Show before you tell
It’s a basic tenet of storytelling, one you learn in introductory writing classes: show, don’t tell.
Consider Odysseus's approach with the Phaeacians. He doesn’t saunter in and declare himself the famous sacker of Troy. Instead, he waits, he listens, and then, importantly, he demonstrates his competence through athletic competition and achievement.
This isn’t manipulation. It’s strategic communication. Odysseus understands that he needs to establish credibility before anyone will believe him.
In practice: Lead with demonstration, not declaration. A B2B firm earns more with a sharp technical explainer than with a "trusted partner" tagline. A B2C can earn more with a repair guide than with a manifesto. A nonprofit earns more with a clear account of what changed than with a mission statement. Make claims after the audience has seen the evidence.
Adapt the telling, not the truth
Odysseus tells a different story to the king, the swineherd, and his wife. He tailors each version for his listener. He reads his audiences before he speaks.
In practice: Keep one core narrative and then shape different versions – or derivatives – for different audiences. The details and emphasis can change. The substance can't.
Build proof that lives outside your narration
The bed is the decisive evidence because Odysseus can't fabricate it. It exists in a shared history that only Penelope can verify.
In practice: Before creating your narrative, ask what a skeptic needs to see. Then provide it. Perhaps it’s customer testimony specific enough to be proven wrong, third-party validation, or published outcomes that include what didn't work. For advocacy organizations, it means letting the people in your story confirm, shape, and revise how they're represented. The strongest proof is the kind an audience can confirm without you.
Know when to stay quiet
Odysseus defeated the Cyclops but couldn’t leave well enough alone. His need for credit turned a clean escape into a decade-long curse.
In practice: Before you claim a cause, join a cultural moment, or put the founder's legend at the center, ask whether your operations can back it up. Public claims create obligations. Audiences will test them.
Expect to be tested, and welcome it
Penelope's skepticism isn't an obstacle to the reunion. It's what makes the reunion real. Reviews, comment threads, procurement questionnaires, and journalists do the same work today.
In practice: Treat scrutiny as the point where trust gets built, not as damage to contain.
Odysseus gets home not because he controlled his story, but because his stories survived tests. That's the standard for communicators now: tell it well, time it right, and make sure that when your audience reaches for proof, the bed doesn't move.
Footnotes
-
As do others but we’re sticking with the main character here. ↩
-
Irene JF de Jong , A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. ↩
-
Also of note: Throughout his narration, Odysseus carefully frames the tragic loss of his twelve ships and companions as the result of his crew's reckless disobedience or divine intervention rather than his own failure as a commander. ↩
-
John Peradotto, Man in the Middle Voice. ↩
-
Outis in Greek, a pun on mētis, meaning cunning intelligence ↩
Bullseye Bingo comes once a month.
No summaries of other people's posts. Just the thinking behind the work when there is something worth sending.
One email a month. Unsubscribe in a click.



